This is partly inspired by Kate and partly by Seth's piece What if all governance is onboarding?

Stages

The following lists the idealised stages a person goes through from somehow hearing about Kanthaus to eventually becoming a member:

  1. <positionless>
    1. becomes aware of existence of Kanthaus (e.g. through some public media)
    2. finds our own media (e.g. website, wiki, mastodon, facebook)
    3. contacts the collective (e.g. email, mattermost, phone, mastodon)
    4. communicates with specific Vol-Mem
    5. (reaches a hosting agreement with specific Vol-Mem)
  2. Visitor
    1. first steps through the door
    2. first day
    3. first 7 days
    4. first check-in
    5. from 8th day
    6. check-in every 7 days cumulative
    7. applies for Volunteer
  3. Volunteer
    1. first week
    2. first month
    3. applies for Member
  4. Member
    1. first month

Each stage represents a point at which information should be transferred. Assuming our critical information is largely monotonic (that is, there is an order which generally makes sense) we should define suggested stages, the sum of which is then required for position transition (i.e. a formal or informal requirement for position transition).

Information architecture

Our information is still in disarray 🥲 Specifically regarding positions, I did some digging in User:Doug/2025 position system proposal and it seems we have already reached XKCD 927 so one more standard can't hurt.

I'm thoroughly biased the wiki should be the medium. I think it makes sense to have one page perhaps called Visiting (with a similar scope as the website page of the same name) and one page for each position. Some information should not be public, the pages can internal link to Nextcloud markdown files. (I am tempted by enabling private pages, but it strongly recommended against)

We should aim to design and write in a way that people can self-educate as much as possible: while we may need to put in more active effort with some people, we certainly shouldn't hold anyone back!

Volunteer and Member expectations

 
I think of this every time I think of the positions...

We've never had an official list of requirements for volunteers or members, but there are clearly factors and phenomena which make achieving these positions more likely. In no particular order:

  • making an account on mattermost
  • posting an introductory message on mattermost
  • becoming a maintainer of some piece of infrastructure
  • presence in regular meetings
  • raising first point in CoMe in an appropriate way
  • multiple social connections to existing vol-mems
  • becoming a contact person between Kanthaus and another group/organization in Wurzen
  • leading a communal meal, using 'best practices'
  • noticing when rules/norms get broken, and constructively raising awareness
  • expressing self-criticism
  • bringing up a critical point with someone
  • learning something
  • teaching something
  • being on time to meetings
  • improving designs, signs, systems, etc
  • ...

It seems to me that for volunteer and member status, there are things which are required (all), desired (some, fuzzy) and bonus (any are nice). This could be two lists for each status, or some kind of table... Or a big bingo, and you need a certain number of points lol.