Talk:Hosting: Difference between revisions

From Kanthaus wiki
Latest comment: 26 November by Doug in topic Before volunteer evaluation
 
add "before volunteer evalution" section
 
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
== "Hosting Duty" from Collective Agreements ==
== Splitting off group hosting? ==


This [https://git.kanthaus.online/kanthaus/kanthaus-governance/pulls/33 pull request] following this [https://ukuvota.kanthaus.online/#/app/eb4b2c79-29c6-8963-4660-3b4df9860917/results ukuvota] lead to the removal of the "Hosting Duty" section of the Collective agreements. The main reason was to reduce redundancy, since Visitor-Host requirements are now declared in the Constitution. Still, it's not clear if all the information has been harvested into this page. So here is the english version:
Although some of individual hosting will be relevant for groups, it is significantly different. [[User:Doug|Doug]] ([[User talk:Doug|talk]]) 14:55, 25 August 2025 (CEST)


> "Hosts—Volunteers or Members which agree to host a Visitor—are responsible for taking care that their Visitor and the other residents have the best time possible. This responsibility includes tour-guiding, question answering, helping to avoid common problems and resolving tensions. Hosts are also responsible for organizing a check-in for the Visitor after the Visitor has spent ~7 days at Kanthaus. The check-in round is an informal chat in which the Visitor, their host and one or two Volunteers/Members see how things are going for the Visitor and other residents. Hosting Duty should be explicitly transferred if the current host leaves for more than 2 or 3 days." [[User:Doug|Doug]] ([[User talk:Doug|talk]]) 23:44, 6 August 2025 (CEST)
== Before volunteer evaluation ==
 
Hosting visitors is the beginning of onboarding, possibly continuing towards Volunteer and Member. Many things should be known by people ''before'' they become Volunteers in my opinion, including at least the content captured in:
 
* [https://kanthaus.online/en/governance/collectiveagreements#relevant-in-first-days Collective Agreements relevant in the first days]
* [https://kanthaus.online/en/governance/collectiveagreements#relevant-after-first-days Collective agreements relevant after the first days]
* [[Meeting culture]]
* [[Additional norms]]
* [https://cloud.kanthaus.online/f/921937 Emergency protocols]
* [[Position attributes table]]
* something like [[User:Doug/How to make changes]] (i.e. general advice on how to do stuff without annoying/being annoyed)
 
We could make understanding this stuff a hard or soft requirement for becoming a Volunteer. But if we only do that, we could (still) end up with 1) people spending a lot of time as a Visitor without knowing this information, and 2) people "cramming" before an evaluation.  
 
My preference would be therefore to spread this stuff across the first 3 check-ins (after which point Volunteer technically possible) in some rational way, at least as recommendations.
 
[[User:Doug|Doug]] ([[User talk:Doug|talk]]) 18:09, 26 November 2025 (CET)

Latest revision as of 18:29, 26 November 2025

Splitting off group hosting?

Although some of individual hosting will be relevant for groups, it is significantly different. Doug (talk) 14:55, 25 August 2025 (CEST)Reply

Before volunteer evaluation

Hosting visitors is the beginning of onboarding, possibly continuing towards Volunteer and Member. Many things should be known by people before they become Volunteers in my opinion, including at least the content captured in:

We could make understanding this stuff a hard or soft requirement for becoming a Volunteer. But if we only do that, we could (still) end up with 1) people spending a lot of time as a Visitor without knowing this information, and 2) people "cramming" before an evaluation.

My preference would be therefore to spread this stuff across the first 3 check-ins (after which point Volunteer technically possible) in some rational way, at least as recommendations.

Doug (talk) 18:09, 26 November 2025 (CET)Reply